--Big Brother Is Watching You!-

Google
Big Brother Is Watching You!
American Science & Engineering of Billerica, MA which sells it's scanners to government agencies such as The US Customs Office has created technology such as the Back scatter X-Ray scanner. These devices can peer through vehicles and detect
 various items such as drugs and people. What concerns me is law enforcement agencies could invoke legislation in where they
just drive up and down american neighborhoods using these scanners to peer into people's homes. If these scanners
are able to pick up anything that may be considered illegal , it will be all they need to acquire a search warrant and come
crashing into your house with the old probable cause cliché'. The technology  is whether a scanner can identify a bag of sugar from a bag of cocaine has not yet been determined, but law enforcement has had less evidence to invade your home, throw you in jail plus the costly expense of defending yourself  in court , even if your acquitted .The future technology coming will include
scanners that not only identify objects and people, but will also have the capabilities to identify a human being's DNA
in which you will never be able to hide from the world satellite system or Big Brother's watchful eye. Above Photo is the
Model 101ZVAN which employs Back scatter technology in a mobile vehicle. Above are images on how the Back scatter X-Ray scanner can identify people hiding in trucks and a car's
fender well filled with drugs.
            ---------- Eye Scanning System Coming
JULY 2000: Travelers soon may be scurrying through airport ticketing lines in the blink of an eye. Eye Ticket Corp. is talking to several airlines and airports about adopting an eye scanning system that it says could dramatically speed up the check in process. "It will instantly check you in without you reaching for a wallet or having a ticket or standing in line," said Evan Smith, senior vice president for Eye Ticket, based in McLean, Virginia. "Just look in the camera and go." By scanning the eye with an ordinary digital camera, the system comes up with a 512 character code based on the characteristics of the iris. That code then can be stored in a database with other information, such as passwords and frequent flier and passport numbers, which participating airlines could share. Eye Ticket, which says the system would be voluntary and free for travelers, had
representatives Monday at Charlotte/Douglas International Airport to show off the program and gauge public interest. By the looks of it, people at the North Carolina airport liked what they saw. Eye Ticket already has installed an iris scanning security system in Charlotte for the U.S. Airways staff and hopes to have a program in place for passengers by the end of
the year.
      Getting Snooped On? Too Bad
You say you don't like browser cookies? You're not quite sure if that program you download from the Net is revealing more about you than it should? Well, here's something to make you really nervous: In the United States, it may be illegal to disable software that snoops on you. The folks who came up with this idea turn out to be the large corporations that helped to draft the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which restricts some forms of tampering with copyright protection devices. In some cases, that means you won't be able to turn off any surveillance features it might include, according to participants in a Thursday afternoon panel at the Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference. " Privacy circumvention is possible only under a limited
circumstance," said Paul Schwartz of the Brooklyn Law School. Privacy advocates fret that if future works are secure and
thus protected under the DMCA, they could reveal consumers' private behavior --Real Networks' Real Jukebox player secretly did just that -- and tinkering with the program to turn off the reporting mechanism would be illegal. " We're getting tortured by laws that are inherently incoherent," complained Barry Steinhardt, associate director of the ACLU. Violating the DMCA is a civil offense, and "willfully" violating it for private financial gain is a criminal offense punishable by five years in jail and a $500,000 fine.
 
     Bank Info Subject to Warrant less Searches
A bank customer who has not requested confidentiality does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in
his or her name or address as a bank customer, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled in a case of first
impression. A three judge panel reversed a Philadelphia Common Pleas Court judge, holding that police
who had obtained a defendant's bank account number were not wrong to request his name and address from
the bank without a warrant. Names and addresses do not reveal the most intimate details of a person's life and
therefore are not protected even by the enhanced right to privacy provided by the Pennsylvania Constitution, a
three judge panel ruled in Commonwealth v. Duncan. Lead judge Kate Ford Elliott said the opinion helped define
what forms of personal information the state constitution does and does not protect. "We therefore conclude 'that
a person's name and address, by themselves, do not constitute information about which a person can have a
reasonable expectation of privacy that society is willing to recognize.'"
 
       DNA Testing Begins Furor in Australia
April 18, 2000: A 44 year old local laborer has been charged in connection with the rape of a 91 year old woman in a small town, following a DNA testing program for most of the town's 600 men. The New Year's Eve 1998 sexual attack on the woman shocked tiny Wee Waa in northern New South Wales. As a result, most of the town's 1,900 residents supported the DNA testing program. Many saw it as a way to catch a perpetrator many feared still walked unpunished in their midst, casting a Twin Peaks like pall over local life. On Monday afternoon, the man walked into Wee Waa police station, asking to speak with detectives. He was later charged in the case, and was being held without bail. Police wouldn't confirm whether he had contributed a DNA sample during the testing program, saying that would have violated the program's confidentiality.
"We were hoping we'd get a breakthrough of this nature," said John Gillett, regional police superintendent. "The assistance
and community support we got helped a lot. " While the latest developments led to sighs of relief, many worry the DNA testing program sets an ugly precedent for future investigations in which personal privacy is forfeited under community pressure. While most of the town's men willingly came forward to give samples, holdouts were scorned. Over time, civil libertarians worry such testing programs could shift the focus of police work toward presuming potential suspects guilty until cleared, rather than innocent until implicated. For his part, Gillett says any curbs on forensic DNA technology are something the legal system must decide. Now that someone's been charged in the case, Gillett said the testing program will be suspended. He took pains to stress that all samples and records will eventually be destroyed and donors notified in writing. ( If you believe that, you need
mental help.) David Sweeney, a local attorney who from the start refused to give a sample, said that the case presents large societal issues. " We need to work in the coming years to see how DNA technology can work toward -- rather than against --
society's goal of avoiding witch hunts," he said. "There are plenty of ways for people to assist in police investigations
without actively becoming a part of them. " To Brett Collins, spokesman for Sydney based community legal watchdog Justice Action, the case has opened a Pandora's Box, with ripple effects hard to control. " Before, we had one person traumatized, now we have 600 people who have had their bodies invaded," Collins said. "And there's still the question of how that genetic material will be handled." The present situation concerning this event was that many people volunteered their sample, but
make no mistake about it, the future will include mandatory testing beginning when babies are born and their DNA is put
on file and stored in a data base for future analysis .

        Child Porn Ring Busted After Running Almost a Year Under Law Enforcement Nose's

Underneath a monstrous heap of electronic kiddy porn, federal prosecutors have uncovered a suburban Texas couple, three foreign web masters, and thousands of customers worldwide who left behind a trail of credit card charges totaling $1 million in April ,2000. Federal prosecutors, who watched with glee as a grand jury handed down an 87 count indictment against the peddlers, say they've never  had such a big case . U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas Paul Coggins said the case is a major step forward in a high stakes fight against the people who sexually abuse children and sell images of the abuse on the Web. Catching the web master, he said, makes finding their victims a real possibility. The indictment charges Fort Worth's Thomas and Janice Reedy with operating a commercial kid porn ring from their home. According to the Texas Secretary of State, the Reedys incorporated their company, called Landslide, Inc., on Feb. 13, 1997 . Prosecutors say Landslide acted as the "gatekeeper" between one Russian and two Indonesian web masters who supplied customers with pornographic images of children in exchange for US $ 29.95 per site. Landslide supplied the password protected access to the sites –- including childrenforcedtoporn.com, childrape.com, and childrenofgod.com, and handled the credit card transactions.
Those charges left behind a handy trail of evidence for prosecutors, who say the Reedys made $1,111,266 in less than
a year. They kept a third of the profits and sent the rest to the foreign web masters. People close to the case said the size of the Reedys' business was enormous. "The extent of the kiddy porn business, the scope of the customers, (and the fact that) they are spread across the states and across the globe, shocked me," Coggins said. Lead prosecutor Terri Moore agreed, calling the scope of the operation "absolutely frightening." "This is a very, very important case," she said. "For child pornography, this is as important as the World Trade Center bombing." "They are particularly heinous," she said. "Many of them kill the children after they abuse  them. They use foreign children, from Eastern Europe and South America. It is the kind of world you can't imagine." The Reedys, who are being held in federal prison until a detention hearing next week, have been forced to take down their alleged kid porn, and most of the sites they once operated are now out of service. But they're still using the  landslide.com site to assert their innocence. "We have committed no illegal act, and are confident to be found innocent of any such charges," the site reads. They're even soliciting funds for their defense on the site. If found guilty, the Reedys face stiff penalties for each of the 87 counts handed down, which carries with them a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.
The Russian web master is charged with 12 counts of the same crimes, while the Indonesian web masters face 16 counts each. U.S. prosecutors are hoping to extradite the accused and try them in Dallas. What probably is the most shocking news is how
a child porn web site can run over year and accumulate over a $1,000,000 in sales before the perpetrators were caught by law enforcement. One can only speculate that with all the snooping capabilities at Big Brother's grasp they can allow a child porn
site to go over a year with out finally apprehending the accused culprits. My only explanation can be this. I myself called and
e-mailed the FBI at Tampa (813-273-4566)& Miami Florida on a site which has no proof of age on it's many "High School Teen Boys. " The web site which was at http://habitantes.elsitio.com/mystudio is the one in question. How do I know this? Because some of the images were from www.modelboy.com which does artistic nudes of male models age 18 to 21. I was told by one women at the Tampa FBI they only investigate child porn. I contacted them again and a male agent said he would investigate but I have never heard from them and FBI agents will not give their name, if they do it will be a alias. The act of no proof of age is a felony in the United States and even though I myself reported it with the names and business's involved, the FBI office seemed uninterested. The web site it seems copies images from newsgroups or web sites and then makes money by charging it's members through a company Net verifier which is called Space Age Services based in Palm Harbor, Florida. Both Net verifier and the web master of elsitio were both contacted  and made aware of the felony being committed but the site was still online as of April 18,2000. I also contacted the Florida Sheriff & Police Department plus the District Attorney (727-464-6221 ) of the county were Net Verifier is located. Net verifier claims they are not responsible for their members content but were  informed  a felony was being committed by one of their members and they are just as guilty knowing about it. They also added the site made allot of money, which Net verifier gets a percentage of. When such a blatant felony is committed and law enforcement does nothing about it, I find it worrisome. The site also claims to have access to thousands of other sites. If anyone has surfed the web I would estimate that 99% of these adult web sites are nothing more than people copying images from newsgroups or scanning pictures from magazines with out no proof of age, model release forms or photo I.D. I'm stunned at the open blatant criminal activity that goes on while law enforcement sits idle. No wonder the kid porn site went on for almost a year before someone got involved. On April 21 the site http://habitantes.elsitio.com/mystudio was shut down, not by law enforcement, but by a citizen's constant e-mails to the businesses .

    You Have to Try & Keep Big Brother in Line
MSNBC Washington spokesman Brock Meeks stated; " When it comes to making policy decisions about cyberspace, The United States Congress makes confessed unabomber Ted Kazynski look like the poster boy for Mental Health Week." in his article of the July, 98 issue of Internet Computing. " They pass a law trying to regulate content on the Internet the so called Communications Decency Act only to see the Supreme Court strike it down as unconstitutional. And like a dog returning to it's own vomit, they resurrect a similar bill, this time vowing it will pass with constitutional muster" Brock writes: There is
no better example than the current attempt to pass legislation banning Internet gambling under The Internet Gaming Prohibition Act. ( S. 474, H.R. 2380 ) . The bill makes it a crime to post odds online or tips on how to, " beat the book. " . Information, in it's rawest forms, is outlawed. The Internet gambling ban is unenforceable on it's face. It all comes down to education.
If you want government to keep their hands off your business, you have to get involved. Make NOISE. Get to Washington and let your members of Congress see your face, and do it on a regular basis. In 1999  Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) with 10 other senators tried to pass The Meth amphetamine Act, ( Senate Bill 1428) which makes it a federal offense to publish any
web site with information on the manufacturing of amphetamine and how to grow marijuana, but also suggested any web site that has a link to such said sites may be put in jail. The idiocy of this type of censorship is laughable according to common sense. The United States does not own the Internet and to think they can pass censorship laws which will have no effect to the
rest of the Internet World just proves one point. I think Senator Orrin Hatch's name represents his mentality, in that he was not born, but hatched from a Doo-Doo Bird egg along with the rest of these 10 idiots from The US Senate who wasted the tax payers dollars time on coming up with such a  proposal. You can go to any high school or college, take chemistry ,and make any drug you can come up with anyway.

Laura DiDio in Computer World June 8 ,1998 magazine writes about how privacy advocates and law enforcement will go head to head over the export of encryption technology. Senators Patrick Leahy and John Ashcroft hope their E-Privacy Act Bill will pass and will present it before the current session of Congress ends in August, 1998. The current limit for encryption products are 56 bit keys and the new Bill proposed would allow selling any products of any strength including 128 and 256 bit keys. At heart of the debate is FBI Director Louis Freeh. The government fears if it can't decode any state of the art
cryptography, that terrorists would benefit. But U.S. businesses and privacy groups contend that giving the government the keys to access everything jeopardizes the privacy of every citizen and business. Ed Gillespie, executive director of the ACP, said the standard limit the government wants to impose, 40 bit key is easily hacked by even teenagers. Gillespie added that the future of electronic commerce relies on industry and citizens feeling safe that their records, tax returns, and medical information won't be accessed by the government or by hackers.

1998 MAY: When PanAmSat's Galaxy IV satellite when down on May 19,1998 by rotating out of position, it caused chaos in American business that most Americans didn't even realize the impact of one satellite's dysfunction; could have on their daily lives and business. At least eight of the ten biggest paging companies relied on the Galaxy IV transmissions to supply their service. Hospitals, police departments, gas stations, stores and other companies services were disrupted. Drivers at Chevron's 5,400 gas stations had to rely on cash or go inside the station to pay by credit cards. How could the repositioning of one satellite do so much damage is because only a few choice satellites currently provide service for North America and maintaining a permanent back up system would be financially expensive. In essence, they have all their eggs in one basket. Above the earth, only eight out of some 200 commercial satellites in orbit are the CHOICE satellites that provide the transmissions of data that American business rely on. The fallout was particularly hard for the nation's broadcasters. Galaxy IV is the primary satellite
for used by CBS, UPN, and WB television and radio network communications. The woes of Galaxy IV could be just a forerunner of things to come. Space scientists are warning that the world's satellite system face a double threat of cosmic showers between now and the year 2001:A meteor shower that peaks every 33 years, and the peak of the Sun's 11 year activity cycle. First there is the threat of the Leonid meteor shower. Last years Leonid showers, which come about the same time each year as Earth orbits the sun, did some minor damage to some spacecraft that orbit our earth.  At least one global satellite sustained a number of hits from grain size particles. The Leonid showers, which also be heavy in November 1999, are probably the biggest threat to orbiting satellites that we have seen in many years. Some sun scientists say they think our sun is due for an unusual hot peak, with a greater than normal number of days in which the sun sends waves of radiation and charged particles, which can can damage satellites in several ways. Also, the year 2000 problem looms even a bigger scenario
as satellites must communicate with computers on earth to transmit electronic transmissions of data. "Numbers can be a better form of cash than paper." said David Chaum of the DigiCash Corporation, who defined ecash as the digital equivalent of cash. You can withdraw digital coins from your Internet bank account and store them on your hard disk. Former Citibank chairman Walter Wriston shares the same vision but moves his idea to a higher plain, the debit card or smart cards. Wriston said in late 1996, referring to chip bearing cards that would contain a persons account information and handle secure transactions for its owner instantly. A form of secrecy and encryption will be essential for the near future One World Money System. A system that will track everything you buy and will be open to prying eyes of government agencies, or sophisticated hackers with the expertise to crack any code. Powerful types of encrypted passwords called digital signatures must be developed that correctly identify the identities of those involved. In other words, its far to early to be sure
any secure encryption can be created and work as planned, but the NEW WORLD MONEY is coming non the less. The Utah Digital Signature Act of 1996 states there is a legal presumption that the person who uses a particular digital signature is the owner, regardless if the owner's password was stolen or acquired by the individual agencies who keep track of such electronic
information. It has long been believed by the IRS and our own government that if every citizen were honest by paying their tax owed, our national debt would disappear in one year. I find this a fairy tale and just a further excuse for agencies to monitor their citizens on what they buy, make, and spend and provide them with more means invade our privacy. In 1999 CitiBank began using sophisticated software to monitor it's customers transactions, putting to a test the Federal Government's proposal that drew criticism to privacy advocates and many in the public sector. The ideology of the monitoring of transactions is to catch money launders but it will be no doubt to trickle down to monitor everyone's banking habits. In 1998 the federal banking regulators issued a proposal to financial institutions to monitor citizen's source of income and investigating those whose transactions seem out of line and reporting them to law enforcement agencies. John Daly, president of Miami based software company America Software Corp, stated CitiBank is the most aggressive bank in monitoring it's customer's financial back ground. The United States Law called the "Banking Secrecy Act" inducted in the 1970's gives the government access to over
235,000 citizens banking transactions. The was introduced to hunt down money launders has convicted only 500 criminals in the last 20 years. This law results in more damage to society and it's citizens privacy than the criminals could have ever caused. We would all be in a cash less society if silicon valley company PAY PAL had it's way. PAY PAL use's palm pilots or other
portable electronic devices to transfer electronic funds to financial institutions where the user has a PIN identification number as in current ATM cards. A cash less society is inevitable to the growth of a One World Economy. Book Author (Virtual Money) and former Federal Reserve economist Elinor Harris Solomon stated in the Wall Street Journal, " The thing that
has always scared me is a bunch of people issuing digital money who aren't insured. " Her fears may be justified because of the history that brought in the National Bank Act in 1863. At that time any bank that set up shop could issue it's own paper exchange backed by any collateral it collected. Soon the banks notes flooded the market and their value sank. Checks
and credit cards came into wide use in the 1970's, quickly replacing cash on large transactions. Today only 3/4 of all purchases are made by a cash used for purchases of $20 or less. Our children are growing use to a cash less society as will future generations. Say good bye to your pay check as it will be a digital transaction. Already the debit card and even finger embedded microchips will be your PIN to access your debit points. The main reason for money is simple in that it will and always will be used for commerce growth.
---------------------------------------------
Big Brother Censorship Report
Censorship of the Internet by governments is spreading and may become a threat to traditional media liberty, a report on press freedom stated in April, 2000. "The explosion of news and information on the World Wide Web is tempting governments, developed and developing, politically free and not free, to consider restricting content on the Internet," said the report conducted by human rights group Freedom House. The group's 22nd annual survey of press freedom, entitled
 "Censor Dot Gov: The Internet and Press Freedom 2000," said governments may use several methods to restrict
information on the Internet, including:

Devising Internet explicit licensing and regulation.

Applying existing restrictive print and broadcast laws to the Web.

Filtering Internet content through control of the servers or using government servers to censor incoming news and information.

Censoring electronic content deemed unacceptable after dissemination.

"The independence of the Internet becomes the newest test of a government's will to encourage and sustain a free
press," said survey coordinator Leonard Sussman in an essay accompanying the 36 page report. The report said some countries restrict Internet access "on the pretext of protecting the public from subversive ideas or violation of national security."
In some parts of Asia, for example, the stated goal of protecting traditional "Asian values" is being used as the pretext to control Internet information and access. In the Middle East, Internet censorship is being promoted under the banner of protecting morality, the report said. " Not only countries with records of not free or partly free news media contemplate controlling the Internet. In 1996, the Clinton administration tried to block pornography on the Internet with the Communications Decency Act, but the law was shot down by the Supreme Court," the report said. Citing a report by Reporters Sans Frontieres, it listed
Azerbaijan, Belarus, Burma, China, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, North Korea, Saudi Arabia,
Sierra Leone, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam as countries that totally or mostly control Internet access. The annual survey, released ahead of World Press Freedom Day said 63 percent of the world's countries restrict print and electronic journalists and 80 percent of the world's people live in countries with a less than free
press. Globally, only 69 countries have a free press, where the flow of information is unrestricted, 51 have a partly free
news media, and 66 countries have government control over print and broadcast systems.

CIA director George Tenet is facing a dilemma familiar to chief executives across most industries: With the Internet making more information available to more people all the time, how can an organization capture every scrap of vital data it needs and filter the choice bits to its top managers? How can it keep that data safe from interlopers? And, above all, how can it do all that faster and better than the next guy? The key difference between Tenet and your average CEO is that if the CIA doesn't keep pace in cyberspace, the outcome might be not a plummeting stock price but real global disasters. Naturally, Tenet wants access to the strongest, fastest and most adept information technology the United States can produce. But with the rise of lucrative consumer and business markets for technology, Uncle Sam isn't the coveted customer and collaborator it used to be. That has led the CIA to take a radical step: attempting to win mind share among cutting edge, new economy companies that cluster in Silicon Valley, Northern Virginia, Boston and Dallas.

Where Will GPS Vehicle Tracking Go?
 The CIA publicly launched In Q Tel. In Q Tel is a private, nonprofit group that works under contract for the
CIA, meaning that Q is free from federal bureaucracy. That's because in the six to 18 months it takes a government agency to buy software, many of today's applications can become obsolete. In Q Tel can pursue all sorts of creative partnership and financing arrangements the CIA can't. In Q Tel and SAI unveiled Net Eraser, software that protects web sites against the kinds of service attacks that crippled some big sites in February, 2000. Q invested $3 million in Net Eraser in exchange for
development input, testing rights and a share of royalties from commercial sales. If the CIA ultimately likes the software, it will license the rights to use it. But neither the agency nor Q ever owns the technology.

 APRIL 2001: The government revealed  that it implanted a satellite tracking device in a suspect's car and tracked him as he drove around Oregon and Washington. Brian Meyer, a special agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, testified that he installed a GPS bug last November in a Nissan Maxima owned by defendant Jim Bell.
But while this appears to be the first criminal prosecution in which a GPS transmitter has been used, many companies manufacture the devices. The GPS device is available to anyone and can be easily installed to track a vehicles location and it's
route that was driving. Many industries use the device such as the trucking industry, rental cars, delivery drivers. The device
puts the vehicle's driver under 24 hour surveillance. The device can be used to track down stolen vehicles, a vehicles whereabouts, and other applications to even how a long a vehicle has been parked as to avoid unauthorized use. These
devices are open to the public as well. A parent may want to install one on their teenagers car or a suspicious spouse may want to track their mate's driving habits. Private detective agencies are at the head of the pack, so you may not even know your car has had a GPS tracking device attached to it for months. Of course the draw back to this type of tracking is the device can not tell who is driving the vehicle, only the vehicle itself. The feds may be using TeleType's GPS CDPD Tracker, which is smaller than a laptop computer and includes a built in Uniden CDPD modem that can also transmit the vehicle's location to any e-mail address.
----------------------------------
                                            How the TeleType System Works
TeleType GPS software includes the ability to transmit vehicle position coordinates in real time via the internet to any email address you specify. Transmission can be automatic or on demand. The software allows you to specify periodic sending of location coordinates. The central station operator can call the remote vehicle (also called "polling") to determine it's location. In addition, the Mobile Tracker option (#1400) allows the same software to be used to record route information and provide street level navigation to the driver. Central station TeleType GPS software plots position of each remote vehicle by automatically interpreting email messages sent from the remote units. Mapping software is included. You can import your own custom maps or use the detailed street level maps that are included with the software. What You Need Since the CDPD Tracker offers a combined wireless CDPD modem with built in GPS receiver - no other equipment is required in the vehicle being tracked. You will only need the TeleType GPS software and maps for base station. ATTI  introduced the newest addition to its growing line of passive vehicle tracking products,  The Shadow Tracker™ Jr. can be concealed almost anywhere within the vehicle, making it an ideal tool for monitoring mobile workforce productivity. A company may track a vehicle covertly to sniff out areas of low productivity within their mobile workforce and to track the daily activities of their mobile vehicles to protect businesses against time sheet fraud and unauthorized use of company vehicles. Also, The Spy Store sells a GPS cellular phone for $1,300 that also allows constant tracking of its whereabouts.

What does all this mean and where is it leading? The future applications of vehicle GPS tracking would point to mandatory installations of the device on ALL vehicles in the near future, ( once the price drops .) The tracking of all vehicles would be a law enforcement's dream, from tracking stolen cars to monitoring a vehicle's speed. As in many highway toll locations, a hidden camera is present and is automatically programed to take a vehicle's photo when it passes a toll booth without paying. The photograph is then sent to the local authorities, and once the license plate is revealed in the photograph, a ticket is automatically sent to that tag owner's address. The same method of tracking will be used in detecting speeding vehicles, registered vehicles whose tag has expired, and numerous other vehicle ticket violations possibilities. The revenue generated from such monitoring will easily cover the cost of it's inception. The future of vehicle GPS monitoring is already here, and the future tracking of all
humans, animals, vehicles and other traceable items Big Brother deems necessary is near.

  DIGITAL DOLLAR

  DIGITAL DOLLAR---


SEARCH &SHOP ON THE GOOGLEBAR

Google

---------