Big Brother Is Watching You!
 

-----------------------

NO SHIRT, NO SHOES, NO WARRANT

June 21, 2004

JUNE 2004: The law enforcement publication POLICE MAGAZINE published an article in their May-June 2004 issue which I found more disturbing than any terrorist attack or threat  to American citizens. The 5th United States Circuit Court has ruled that law enforcement officers are not required to obtain a search warrant prior to investigating a business or residence.. As of now, only the states of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi fall under the New Orleans United States Circuit Court ruling. According to the article, prior to March 24, 2004, protective sweeps ( as they are called ) were deemed legal if only the search was done with intent to arrest a suspect. This new decision was handed down in accord concerning the 1994 case of United States vs. Kelly Gould. This incident is another example of more intrusion on the American citizens rights to privacy, and the threat of a citizens safety while residing in their own home. When law enforcement officers come crashing through your front door, guns are drawn and the prospect of innocent people being shot will increase ten fold. I myself have seen the mentality of certain law enforcement officers in the Oklahoma City Court House. In the court house's sheriff office, I noticed a flyer on the bulletin board which read, BE PREPARED TO SHOOT SOMEONE TODAY. I was appalled at this type of bulletin board advertisement that promotes homicide. I asked the officer on duty why such unethical and dangerous propaganda is posted on their bulletin board. The officer's justification of this was the numerous incidents where police officers were shot while on duty. I responded with, that's sad that people who are paid to protect us are killed in the line of duty. I then asked this officer where is the poster that shows the numerous innocent citizens that were killed by law enforcement agents? The officer had no reply to that inquiry. One final note is that I informed this officer that more law enforcement agents died by suicide than being killed in the line of duty the previous year.

The majority of the American population are not even aware of  these laws that attack their freedoms. It took only 45 days after the September 11 attacks, with virtually no debate, Congress passed the THE PATRIOT ACT. Many parts of this sweeping legislation take away checks on law enforcement and threaten the very rights and freedoms that we are struggling to protect. For example, without a warrant and without probable cause, the FBI now has the power to access your most private medical records, your library records, and your student records, and can prevent anyone from telling you it was done. JaysNet already reported that The Department of Justice is expected to introduce a sequel, dubbed PATRIOT ACT II, that would further erode key freedoms and liberties of every American. I advise you to contact your Senator and protest the acceleration of these new laws which are ludicrous, and nothing more than a excuse for Big Brother to advance his goals of world monitoring, and hiding behind the guise that these laws are designed to fight terrorists. Congress must first re-examine provisions of the first PATRIOT Act to ensure that is in alignment with key constitutional protections. The abuse of these laws are growing and they must be stopped now before it's to late.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation documents turned over to the American Civil Liberties Union and other civil liberties organizations under court order reveal that the FBI invoked a controversial provision of the Patriot Act only weeks after Attorney General John Ashcroft publicly declared that this power had never been used. Among the records released is an FBI memorandum, dated October 15, 2003, indicating that the FBI submitted an application for an order under Section 215 of the Patriot Act less than a month after the Attorney General made his announcement. The records disclosed to the ACLU do not indicate how many times the FBI has invoked Section 215 since October 2003.

"From the latest documents we’ve received from the government, it appears that Attorney General Ashcroft released records when it suited his political purposes and then attempted to withhold them when it didn’t," said Jameel Jaffer, an ACLU Staff Attorney. "The records we’ve obtained suggest once again that the government’s secrecy decisions are guided not by national security concerns but by political ones." The records about the government’s use of the Patriot Act were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in October 2003 on behalf of the ACLU, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression and the Freedom to Read Foundation. Even after the requesters filed legal action in December 2003, the FBI attempted to stonewall the request for information, stating that the records could not be produced before June 2005. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ultimately overturned the FBI’s decision to withhold the documents until 2005 and ordered the FBI to release the documents over a period of six weeks. This week’s release was the first of two expected; a further release is expected in early July.

"A veil of secrecy has shrouded the Patriot Act for two and a half years. The fragments of information that we have managed to pry out of the Justice Department raise serious questions and provide few answers," said David Sobel, General Counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "It is time for an open public debate on this controversial law." Among the other documents released by the FBI is an e-mail that acknowledges that Section 215 can be used to obtain physical objects, in addition to records. It states that the FBI could use Section 215 to obtain a person's apartment key. The Attorney General has previously acknowledged that Section 215 can be used to obtain computer files and even genetic information. Another document released by the FBI is an internal FBI memo, dated October 29, 2003, acknowledging that Section 215 of the Patriot Act can be used to obtain information about innocent people. The memo contradicts the governments assertion, made repeatedly on the public record, that Section 215 can be used only against suspected terrorists and spies. "It is remarkable that the government never made any effort to inform the plaintiffs or even the Court that it has begun using Section 215," said Ann Beeson, Associate Legal Director of the ACLU. Below are a few examples of The Patriot Act :

Sec. 215. Access to records and other items under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Sec. 326. Verification of identification.
Sec. 351. Amendments relating to reporting of suspicious activities.
Sec. 405. Report on the integrated automated fingerprint identification system for ports of entry and overseas consular posts.
Subtitle Enhanced Immigration Provisions
Sec. 416. Foreign student monitoring program.
Sec. 503. DNA identification of terrorists and other violent offenders.
Sec. 507. Disclosure of educational records.

The key to these law definitions is that their is no key. It's wording and it's meaning can be interrupted in numerous fashions. One example is what and whom are terrorists? What defines a terrorist ? One example, according to The Bush administration, is a hacker is defined as a terrorist. My conclusion is this type of government agenda reminds me of the Nazi mentality in the 1930s where the Nazi Party encouraged it's citizens to report suspicious activities being committed by their neighbors, their family, or fellow workers. The outcome led to the banning of all commerce and rights of the jewish citizen, which led to Hitler's final solution to the jewish problem where over six million jewish citizens were murdered in the concentration camps. The similarities of  The Patriot Act and The Third Reich are frightening due to the similar doctrine concerning the way both ideologies were born and then made into law.U.S. Navy Admiral John Hutson was quoted, "How can we fight to uphold the rule of law if we break the rules ourselves?"

To say the Bush Administration has demonstrated that it is unwilling and unable to investigate itself, is a understatement. But this has been the policy of those drunk with power since the ending of War World II. Being part of the executive branch gives those in power the abilities to abuse the law and then try to justify their actions with such gibberish as " threats to national security " and numerous other clichés' to cover up their immoral and unethical political agendas. The American Civil Liberties Union called on President Bush and other top government officials to appoint an independent commission to review the mistreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. "Only an independent investigation, removed from political obligations, can help assure the world that the Presidents apology for the Abu Ghraib abuses was a sincere expression of regret for appalling conduct, and not a calculated efforts at damage control for appalling images." said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. In letters addressed to President George Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft, the ACLU called for the establishment of an independent commission to review current policies, including the Geneva Conventions and their application on detainees, to examine the extent of abuse, mistreatment and torture, and to recommend reforms.  The commission would investigate all prisoners held by any government agency, military branch or private contractor. The letters also called for the appointment of a special counsel to determine the extent of criminal wrongdoing, including violations of federal law prohibiting torture and breaches of the Geneva Conventions, in the mistreatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, and elsewhere.

The ACLU pointed to memoranda drafted by top Administration officials that provided justification for disregarding the Geneva Conventions and for using extraordinary interrogation practices, adopting what the memoranda acknowledge was a controversial, and highly restrictive, definition of torture and outlining possible defenses from criminal prosecution. The memoranda also take the extraordinary position that the President, as Commander in Chief, has the authority to disregard the commands of federal criminal laws prohibiting torture if necessary to obtain information from enemy prisoners. At a Senate Oversight hearing, Attorney General Ashcroft repeatedly refused to provide information on the memoranda, or provide senators with copies, promoting Senator Joe Biden (D-CT) to quip, "You are not allowed, under our Constitution, not to answer our questions, and that isn't constitutional." The refusal of the Administration to comply with Congressional requests for information, demonstrates the need for an independent review of the abuses scandal. The Center for Constitutional Rights and others have also filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, charging that the Department of Defense and other government agencies illegally withheld records concerning the abuse of detainees in American military custody. The initial FOIA request expressed concern, now validated by the Abu Ghraib photographs, that detainees in U.S. custody were being subjected to abuse and even torture. "Congress has a constitutional mandate to review these policies, and still the Administration stonewalls such efforts," said Timothy Edgar, an ACLU Legislative Counsel. "The public has a right to know what why these abuses were allowed to take place and who was ultimately responsible. The failure to appoint a credible, independent investigator will be perceived as part of an attempt to pin the blame for the scandal on a few privates and sergeants, and shield high level Administration officials from responsibility."

The Domestic Security Enhancement Act (also called “Patriot Act 2”) Further dismantles court review of surveillance, such as by terminating court approved limits on police spying on religious and political activity. It allows the government to obtain credit records and library records secretly and without judicial oversight. Allows wiretaps without a court order for up to 15 days following a terrorist attack Allows government to operate in secret by authorizing secret arrests, and imposing severe restrictions on the release of information about the hazards to the community posed by chemical and other plants. Patriot Act II further expands the reach of an already over broad definition of terrorism so that organizations engaged in civil disobedience are at risk of government wiretapping. These are only a few examples of the increased powers that the new bill would grant to the government. Under our Constitution, government powers are subject to control by the courts, the Congress, and ultimately by the American people, informed by a free press.  Checks and balances help ensure both safety and freedom.  They ensure that government actions taken for very important purposes, such as to prevent terrorism or other crime, do not violate the rights of ordinary citizens, and that government is held accountable when they do.  They also help the government, ensuring that its resources are concentrated on arrests of real criminals, not on ineffective, feel good solutions advanced by political leaders anxious to reassure a frightened public. Patriot Act 2’s laundry list of new powers will not only erode certain fundamental rights of terrorism suspects or other criminal defendants, but also contains powers which could be directed at ordinary people, such as protesters with diverse political viewpoints, members of community, environmental and religious organizations, library users and ordinary immigrants, including legal permanent residents.

When Congress enacted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), it intended those extraordinary powers to be used against the Mafia and organized crime.  Over the years, however, RICO was used far more broadly, even against anti-abortion protesters and other dissidents. JaysNet  is deeply concerned that some of the powers the government may be seeking in Patriot Act 2, while ostensibly directed at terrorists, could likewise be used and abused in unexpected ways. Under an existing, over broad definition of international and domestic “terrorism,” any individual or group that breaks the law with the intent of influencing the government can be labeled a terrorist if their activities are “dangerous to human life. Under that definition, diverse “direct action” organizations, including Operation Rescue, the World Trade Organization protesters, and others could conceivably be labeled “terrorist organizations.”

BIG BROTHER MOTTO IS SILENCE IS GOLDEN

Ann Stauber, a 60 year old diabetic woman in a wheelchair, who was herded into a holding pen on the street. She was forbidden to leave by the NYPD even after she told them that she urgently needed to find a bathroom and then return home to check her blood sugar. An officer forcibly stopped her when she attempted to leave and, in the process, broke the controls on her wheelchair.

Jeremy Conrad, a 27 year old law student, who was trapped in a barricaded area and then injured when a horse stepped on him. When he complained to NYPD officers that the crowd could not move, he was arrested and maliciously pushed and kicked by officers. Conrad was detained in the back of a police van for about seven and a half hours without food, water or bathroom facilities. The NYPD then forced Conrad and others to stand outside police headquarters for approximately an hour and a half in 14 degree weather before releasing him.

The late Jeremiah Gutman and his family, who were hemmed in by police as they attempted to march to the rally site. Police offered either no information or inaccurate information to the trapped demonstrators. Then, without warning, police on horses drove into the crowd. While trying to protect his young son, the 79 year old Mr. Gutman was knocked to the ground and injured.

In closing, I would like to ad a true story that occurred while a cab driver was transporting me to the Oklahoma City Court House. The cab driver informed me that his cousin, a elderly lady who was visiting from Germany for a family reunion, was being hammered by her american relatives on the subject of American freedom. This elderly german citizen was over overwhelmed by statements from her american relatives, which were mainly on the subject of freedom. The American relatives kept asking this german citizen how great it must feel to be in America, how great it must be to feel free of communist rule, how gratifying it must be to feel complete freedom and to voice opinions against the government under the freedom of speech. After all these statements the elderly german lady paused, then replied to her American relatives. " You Americans are under worse rule and government intrusion than myself and many other germans were during the era of Hitler and the cold war." The relatives were dumbfounded by her direct and truthful response. It took a elderly german women to open the eyes of her American relatives on the realities of current American policies on the issues of privacy and human rights.

YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT

JAYSNET  1997 TO 2004
--------------June 28, 2004

THE CASH LESS SOCIETY BY 2012

THE BAR CODE

Another interesting theory is the UPC bar code which contains the numeric numbers 6,6,6 and other numeric values associated with the bar code. Is this "666" the number of a single man? Or will it be the number of "mankind"? Is it literal or figurative?  As with above article, this bar code theory of 666 is a interesting theory. We are all familiar with the UPC code. We see the bar code on nearly every product we buy, but many are not aware that the bar code operates on a "666" system. Yes, perhaps not surprisingly, the products we buy contain a "666" on their bar code. First let's look at the construction of the bar code. This means that each bar code contains a 6, 6, 6.. Is the bar code the mark of the beast? No, but the theory of 666 on a bar code which is on almost everything we purchase is quite interesting from a biblical and research point of view. Below is a example of the bar code theory.

---

-------------------------------

THE HISTORY OF THE BAR CODE

The following year he and Silver set out to build the first actual bar code reader in the living room of Woodlands house in Binghamton, New York. The device was the size of a desk and had to be wrapped in black oilcloth to keep out ambient light.
It relied on two key elements: a five hundred watt incandescent bulb as the light source and an RCA 935 photo multiplier tube, designed for movie sound systems, as the reader. Woodland hooked the 935 tube up to an oscilloscope. Then he moved a piece of paper marked with lines across a thin beam emanating from the light source. The reflected beam was aimed at the tube.  As the paper moved, the signal on the oscilloscope jumped. He and Silver had created a device that could electronically read printed material. Bar code was not commercialized until 1966 ( Perhaps just a fluke, but the year 1966 does contain 666, although the 9 is upside down.). The National Association of Food Chains (NAFC) put out a call to equipment manufacturers for systems that would speed the checkout process. In 1967 RCA installed one of the first scanning systems at a Kroger store in Cincinnati. The product codes were represented by "bull's eye bar codes", a set of concentric circular bars and spaces of varying widths. These bar codes were not preprinted on the item's packaging, but were labels that were put on the items by Kroger employees. But there was problems with the RCA and Kroger code. It was recognized that the industry would have to agree on a standard coding scheme open to all equipment manufacturers to use and adopted by all food producers and dealers.

In 1969 ( As with the 1966 example, 1969 contains 6,6,6, with two nines being upside down.), the NAFC asked Logicon, Inc. to develop a proposal for an industry wide bar code system. The result was Parts 1 and 2 of the Universal Grocery Products Identification Code (UGPIC) in the summer of 1970. Based on the recommendations of the Logicon report, the U.S. Supermarket Ad Hoc Committee on a Uniform Grocery Product Code was formed. Three years later, the Committee recommended the adoption of the UPC symbol set still used in the USA today. It was submitted by IBM and developed by George Laurer, whose work was an outgrowth of the idea of Woodland and Silver. Woodland was an employee at the time of IBM. In June 1974, one of the first UPC scanner, made by NCR Corp. (which was then called National Cash Register Co), was installed at Marsh's supermarket in Troy, Ohio. On June 26, 1974, the first product with a bar code was scanned at a
check-out counter. It was a 10 pack of Wrigley's Juicy Fruit chewing gum. The pack of gum wasn't specially designated to be
the first scanned product. It just happened to be the first item lifted from the cart by a shopper whose name is long since lost to
history. Today, the pack of gum is on display at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History. The event that really got bar code into industrial applications occurred September 1, 1981 when the United States Department
of  Defense adopted the use of Code 39 for marking all products sold to the United States military. Meanwhile Computer Identical prospered. Its system used lasers which in the late 1960s were just becoming affordable. A milli watt helium neon laser beam could easily match the job done by Woodland's unwieldy five hundred watt bulb. A thin stripe moving over a bar code would be absorbed by the black stripes and reflected by the white ones, giving scanner sensors a clear on/off signal. Lasers could read bar codes anywhere from three inches to several feet away, and they could sweep back and forth like a searchlight hundreds of times a second, giving the reader many looks at a single code from many different angles. That would prove to be a great help in deciphering scratched or torn labels.

 In the spring of 1969 Computer Identical quietly installed its first two systems probably the first true bar code systems anywhere. One went into a General Motors plant in Pontiac, Michigan. The other went into a distribution facility run by the General Trading Company in Carlsbad, New Jersey, to help direct shipments to the proper loading bay doors. Computer Identics's triumph proved the potential for bar codes in industrial settings. but it was the grocery industry that would once again provide the impetus to push the technology forward. In the early 1970s the industry set out to propel to full commercial maturity the technology that Woodland and Silver had dreamed up and Computer Identics had proved feasible. Then, in mid 1970, an industry consortium established an ad hoc committee to look into bar codes. The committee set guidelines for bad code development and created a symbol selection subcommittee to help standardize the approach. This would be the grocery industry's Manhattan Project IBM's facilities in North Carolina, played a prominent role in developing the most popular and important version of the technology: the Universal Product Code (UPC). The adoption of the Universal Product Code, on April 3, 1973, transformed bar codes from a technological curiosity into a business juggernaut. When the UPC took over, companies were forced to give up their individual methods and register with a new Uniform Code Council (UCC).
                           Uniform Code Council Logo

-------------------------------------
                                                  Uniform Code Council, Inc.
                                           7887 Washington Village Drive, Suite 300
                                                           Dayton, OH  45459
                                                    Email: info@uc-council.org
-----------------------------------http://www.uc-council.org

 The code is split into two halves of six digits each. The first one is always zero, except for products like meat and
 produce that have variable weight, and a few other special items. The next five are the manufacturers code the next five
 are the product code: and the last is a check digit used to verify that the preceding digits have been scanned properly.
 Woodland never got rich from bar codes, though he was awarded the 1992 National Medal of Technology by President
 Bush. But all those involved in the early days speak of the rewards of having brought a new way of doing business to
 the world.

THE COMING OF THE B.E.A.S.T

" Broadened Electronic Analysis Surveillance Technology "

The program will attempt to develop a computer that will surpass Japan's Earth Simulator, built by NEC in 2002 and capable of sustaining nearly 36 trillion calculations per second. With the NEC computer in 2002, Japan became the world leader in having the most powerful computer for scientific research, one even faster than computers used at the government nuclear weapons laboratories. "This computer will propel the United States into the global lead in high speed computers aimed at scientific discovery," according to Abraham. Other applications which will be employed by The B.E.A.S.T remain unknown, but it's use in the military and law enforcement community is inevitable. Super fast computers do more than solve complicated sets of equations. They allow for sophisticated simulations that lead to scientific discoveries once only found through lengthy experimentation. For example, super computers are key in the Energy Department's attempt to simulate the forces of a nuclear explosion, replacing actual bomb testing. "We are making this significant investment in America's scientific infrastructure with the expectation that it will yield a wealth of dividends, major research breakthroughs, significant technological innovations, medical and health advances, enhanced economic competitiveness and improved quality of life," Abraham stated. While the Japanese are to be congratulated for their accomplishment, the United States "must make the commitment necessary to regain the clear cut lead" in super computing, he contends. "This is exactly what we are going to do," promised Abraham.

Over 20 years ago a christian science publication announced the existence of a massive computer which was named The Beast, supposedly located in Belgium. This story was later found to be untrue, but even the mention of a world computer which collects data on the human race for the possible purpose of monitoring and marking human beings, was eerily compared to a beast system mentioned in the christian Bible's Book of Revelation.

Other endeavors to improve technology in the areas of communication are also being completed. The U.S. Air Force launched it's new GPS satellite in March 2004 from Cape Canaveral in Florida. The satellite which is manufactured by Lockhead Martin has advanced features such as an upgraded antenna panel for improved power and performance. The launch was the 50th in the United States GPS program. As of May 2004, their are at least 28 of these GPS satellites in orbit, with 10 of them being the new GPS IIR spacecraft design.. Lockheed Martin already has designs for the a more improved GPS satellite which is scheduled for launch in March 2005. The satellite has been named GPS III.

The National ID Card

Unfortunately, at a time when Americans are vulnerable to terrorists, they're also most vulnerable to politicians who want to pass laws that we'll all regret later. The current United States Attorney General John Ashcroft and his drafting of The Patriot Act is a catastrophic law which erodes not only your privacy, but your life as well. Americans must stand up and say no to a national ID card. It's time to let everyone know that we will never surrender, either to terrorists or to the misguided politicians who insist that Americans need to give up freedom in order to preserve it.

The Big Brother Project "Eye Sky Technology"

But what if you could manipulate particles in the atmosphere and make the sky a sort of projection screen? This would
explain the passage. A rainbow is a primitive example made by nature to illustrate this phenomenon and technology
is in the process of making the atmosphere a huge reflective device such as you would see in a planetarium. This technology
reminds of the 1960s television show Batman, in which the bat signal was a projected light image where the sky was illuminated with a bat in the sky.

New technology is being introduced where atmospheric particles may be manipulated by satellites ,scanners ,computer
imaging that will turn the earth's atmosphere into a huge reflective screen code named EYE SKY. The technology could
be used from anything as news breaking events to propaganda projected in the atmosphere for the whole world to see.
Below is basic information on how a rainbow appears and you will see how simple this new technology will be created.
--------------------------------------

                                 ----The Rainbow Project

The colors of the rainbow arise from two basic facts. Sunlight is made up of the whole range of colors that the eye can detect. The range of sunlight colors, when combined, looks white to the eye. This property of sunlight was first demonstrated by Sir Isaac Newton in 1666. Light of different colors is refracted by different amounts when it passes from one medium (air, for example) into another (water or glass, for example ) . William Livingston, a solar astronomer who has also specialized in atmospheric optical phenomena suggests the following: "Try a hose spray yourself. As you produce a fine spray supernumeraries up to order three become nicely visible. Rainbows, sunsets and halos; a spectacular display of colors and visual in the sky called "atmospheric optics". As sunlight (or moonlight) enters the atmosphere, it is either absorbed, reflected, scattered, refracted or diffracted by atmospheric particles or air molecules. These processes, individually or in combination, are responsible for producing most optical effects. This module investigates these particle light interactions and the assortment of optical effects they produce. The Light and Optics module has been organized into the following sections:

1. Mechanisms: Particle and Molecule light interactions responsible for creating optical effects. These interactions include reflection, scattering, refraction and diffraction.

2. Air, Dust, Haze: Optical effects resulting from the interaction of light with air, dust and haze particles. These effects include
crepuscular rays, blue skies, blue haze and sunsets.

3. Ice Crystals: Optical effects resulting from the interaction of light with ice crystals. These effects include sundogs, sun
 pillars and halos.

4. Water Droplets: Optical effects resulting from the interaction of light with water droplets. These effects include cloud
 iridescence, rainbows and a silver lining along the edge of clouds.

In the 2001 September Issue of Popular Science companies such as Marinello & Callaway of Arlington Texas were working on the MyLar billboard, which is more than 12 miles in diameter and would use light refection from the sun would light up the sky with any advertisement claiming the whole world would be able to view it.Another company Space Marketing of Roswell,Georgia had a similar plan in the 1990's. Thanks to congress such ads in space were banned,but it would not stop other nations to envoke such eye-in-the-sky billboards.

IN THE END, MAN CREATED GOD
-------------------July 17,2004

What if scientists were to use the DNA samples of past historic figures such as Adolph Hitler, Albert Einstein, John F. Kennedy, and impregnate a woman with this genetically engineered embryo in hopes of producing a human with all the attributes of a super diplomat or scientist? While many of you feel this is impossible and is something more adapted from a Tom Clancy novel or a Steven Spielberg film, you are wrong. If this process has not yet happened, it is only a matter of time before
scientists take this step. This type of current scientific knowledge reminds me of a line from the movie Jurassic Park, where Dr. Malcomb questioned the cloning of dinosaurs as unethical and said, "Your scientists were so preoccupied in whether or not they could, they didn't stop and think if they should."

BIG BROTHER IN THE USA AND EUROPE GROWS

-------------THE U.S.A. NOW STANDS FOR THE "UNITED
--------------------SURVEILLANCE  ABERRATION "
JULY 2004; The United States is now a full fledged surveillance society. The tremendous explosion in surveillance enabling technologies, combined with the ongoing weakening in legal restraints that protect our privacy has led us into a global surveillance community.  The bad news is that it can't be stopped and will proceed at a accelerated growth in The United States, that even George Orwell's 1984 novel, or the christian King James Bible's mention of 666 and a One World Government could even fathom it's realities. Americans and the Global community need to step back from the daily drum of privacy stories and realize the big picture:  the United States has turned into a full fledged surveillance society.  The fact is, George Orwell and The Book of Revelation's vision of "Big Brother" is now a  technological reality. The American Big Brother, Attorney General John Ashcroft, is asking the Federal Communications Commission for sweeping new authority to regulate the design of Internet communications services to make them easier to wiretap. If implemented, this Ashcroft plan would dramatically increase the governments surveillance power and making surveillance and privacy violations and the abuse much more widespread.  It would force technology companies to build backdoors in their systems for wiretapping and thereby create weaknesses that hackers, thieves and rogue government agents, including The United States law enforcement agencies capable to further exploit existing laws to invade your privacy with greater ease and completely void of any judicial or constitutional process. These laws also make these agencies immune from any type of state or federal prosecution. The government already has more than enough power to spy on individuals suspected of wrongdoing. This measure is the equivalent of requiring all new homes be built with a peephole for law enforcement agents to look through. A sweeping increase in law enforcement's surveillance powers such as this should be reviewed by Congress, and not issued by the Justice Department with the approval of the FCC.  This is especially important since this Department of Justice has demonstrated it has little respect for privacy rights and instead wants to dramatically increase surveillance of regular people. In short, it's as if former FBI director J. Edger Hoover has risen from the grave to continue his witch hunts. The FBI can already collect information between sources like phone companies and data sources like e-mail.  The FBI's aggressive and expansive abuse of the law would bypass the legislative process. The Ashcroft plan would harm the infrastructure of the Internet itself and risk making our communications easier targets for hackers and thieves, and the criminal element of police officers and federal agents that infect all state and federal law enforcement agencies. With the advent of cheap and powerful new technologies, and the ever increasing collection of data about our activities and our lives, mass surveillance has become easier than ever. Unfortunately, the threat of terrorism has prompted many Americans to embrace these sharp increases in government surveillance over our private lives.  Too many people think we can stop terrorism by monitoring all the hundreds of millions of people who live in America, and by removing the legal safeguards that protect us against our own government. This form of civilian surveillance is a travesty, not only does it threaten our privacy, but it will be abused by the government and the people most affected will not be terrorists, but law abiding citizens.

National Security

Martial Law is Big Brothers Ultimate Goal

Presidential Constitutional and Statutory Authority to Invoke Martial Law

The U.S. Supreme Court has herein decided that the President has dictatorial power, including the power to suspend the Constitution. including unrestrained powers to act toward insurrectionary citizens as if they were enemies of the United States, and thus place them outside the protection of the constitution. The Constitution can be suspended by any President of the United States who ascertains and proclaims a widespread territorial revolt. Moreover, such plenary power, even in the face of state government opposition has been authorized by Congress. The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy. Prior to your use of such force, it is anticipated that you will issue an appropriate proclamation. Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time.

------------------------------------------
------------The Three Stooges or The Three Storm Troopers?
The threat of imposing martial law is becoming a reality every day. The revelations concerning the Untied States war against Iraq had nothing to do with freeing the Iraqi people. The war was conceived through deception and propaganda by the Bush Administration.. The reason American soldiers are in Iraq is simple, the United States access to Middle East oil. In 2004 Iraq produced over 10% of the earth's crude oil reserves. The removal of Saddam Hussein, was essential in my opinion. Hussein had already proven he would use chemical weapons, not only in the Iran~Iraq war, but Hussein used chemical weapons on his own citizens, mainly the Kurds in northern Iraq. The way the Iraq war was conceived and presented to the world's leaders and the American people was filled with lies, deceit, and misdirection from the Bush Administration. One of the proposals of Patriot Act II,  include anyone who poses a threat to national security ( real or imagined ) would be stripped of their citizenship, thus having no rights and would be prey to the same torture used on Iraqi prisoners, Guantanamo Bay inmates, and those imprisoned in Afghanistan. The exposure of the torture being used in the Iraq prison was shocking to anyone in the free world. What I found more shocking, was over 1,000 inmates of this prison were set free within days, thus, their imprisonment was based on speculation and not on facts. As I have reported before, the John Ashcroft rule of law is convict now, and trial later. The propaganda which portray John Ashcroft, and President Bush as christians on a crusade against evil is one of the best deceptive propaganda portrayal of world leaders ever used. If anyone has read the Bible, probably the biggest threat to Jesus in The New Testament wasn't Satan, but it was the Scribes and Pharisees whom were the church leaders at that time. It was these church leaders who accused Jesus falsely which led to his crucifixion. According to The Declaration of Independence, it's the consent of the governed, not the government, that dictates American rights and liberties. As Americans, when we recognize government abuses against it's own citizens, it's the duty of all Americans to resist such a government. The Three Stooges or The Three Storm Troppers,are both are fitting portrayals of  President George Bush, Attorney General John Ashcroft, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
----------------------------------------------
Vice President Dick Cheney tells Senator to" GO F#CK YOURSELF!"
In closing, let us not forget Vice President Dick Cheney's eloquent and cordial outburst on the senate floor in late June of 2004. The Cheney outburst of  "Go f#ck yourself" made to Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy was nothing short of  the political politeness that all Americans have grown accustomed too. After the outburst, the Vice President  commented, "I expressed myself rather forcefully, but I felt better after I had done it,". So here is the American Citizen's message to George Bush, John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld, and Dick Cheney, "GO F*CK YOURSELF!" You know what, now all Americans feel better!

-----------------------THE NUCLEAR ARMAGEDDON THEORY

SPACE WEAPONS DEPLOYMENT

JULY 2004: The June, 2004 death of former United States president Ronald Reagan was not the death of his STAR WARS Space based weapons system. The political and military view of STAR WARS was deemed that it's purpose was strictly a defensive ploy to shoot down any weapons launched against the United States. This analyst of STAR WARS is true to a certain degree but it's major objective is using these space based orbiting satellites to attack adversary nations from space by destroying their key elements of communications and infrastructure, thus causing chaos and anarchy. These space based weapons add enormous flexibility with their targeting capabilities to destroy and neutralize any nation which poses a threat to The United States. Any weapon designed under the guise for defensive deployment can be used as a offensive alternative as well.

Laser Airborne Optics

The Latest in Satellite Surveillance Technology

------------------THE MX MISSILE

--------
--THE MX MISSILE PROJECT 1979~1996
-Total Yield 300  to 3000 Kilotons per Missile
A MX can contain 5 to 10 multiple 300 kiloton war heads
1 kiloton    = One ton (  2000 pounds of TNT  )
1 megaton = One Million (  2,000,000 pounds of TNT  )

The MX, also called The Peace keeper missile is America's newest intercontinental ballistic missile.  The Peace keeper (designated LGM-118A) is a four stage intercontinental ballistic missile capable of carrying up to ten independently targetable reentry vehicles with greater accuracy than any other ballistic missile. Its design combines advanced technology in fuels, guidance, nozzle design, and motor construction with protection against the hostile nuclear environment associated with land based systems. The Peacekeeper is a three stage rocket ICBM system consisting of three major sections: the boost system, the post boost vehicle system and the re-entry system. The post boost vehicle also employed a self contained inertial navigation system that allowed the missile to operate independent of ground reference or commands during flight. The top section of the Peacekeeper is the re-entry system. It consists of the deployment module, up to 10 cone shaped re-entry vehicles and a protective shroud. The shroud protects the re-entry vehicles during ascent. It is topped with a nose cap, containing a rocket motor to separate it from the deployment module. Each deployed re-entry vehicle follows a ballistic path to its target.

President Carter made his 12 June 1979 decision to proceed with full scale engineering development of the Missile-X. The President augmented this decision on 7 September 1979 and full scale engineering development began one week later. In the 1980s President Reagan instructed the Air Force to conduct a technical assessment to deploy an ICBM quickly as a demonstration of national resolve to preserve deterrence and the United States global nuclear supremacy and it's capability to launch a full nuclear strike of mass destruction against any threat to American security. The Air Force successfully conducted the first test flight of the Peacekeeper June 17, 1983, from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif. The missile traveled 4,190 miles (6,704 kilometers) before dropping six unarmed test re-entry vehicles on planned target sites in the Kwajalein Missile Test Range in the Pacific Ocean. The first two test phases consisted of 12 test flights to ensure the Peacekeeper's subsystems performed as planned, and to make final assessments of its range and payload capability.

Peacekeeper production began in February 1984 with the production of 50 MX missiles. The second increment of 50 MX missiles would replace Minuteman IIIs missiles belonging to the 319th Strategic Missile Squadron. The completion date of the deployment was scheduled for December 1989. Under the rail garrison plan concept, the Peacekeeper missiles would be placed on trains stationed at various U.S. Air Force installations. The 25 trains, each carrying two missiles, would deploy off base and onto the national railroad network during periods of international tension to improve survivability. In February 1987, the Air Force selected ten additional bases as candidate rail garrison locations. That same year, Congress appropriated $350 million to fund rail garrison research and development. Exercises conducted in 1988 tested and refined the concept of operations, and in May the Secretary of Defense authorized the Air Force to proceed with Peacekeeper Rail Garrison full scale development. The Air Force achieved initial operational capability of 10 deployed Peacekeepers at F.E. Warren AFB, Wyo., in December 1986. Full operational capability was achieved in December 1988 with the establishment of a squadron of 50 missiles.

The specifications of the MX-Peacekeeper Missile are;
Name; The MX  Intercontinental ballistic missile
Length: 71 feet
Weight: 195,000 pounds
Diameter: 7 feet, 8 inches
Range: Greater than 6,000 miles
Speed: Approximately 15,000 miles per hour
Warheads: 10 Avco MK 21 re-entry vehicle nuclear war heads
Yield: 300 to 3,000 Kilotons depending on individual war heads per missile
Unit Cost: $70 million

There are two types of nuclear reactions which are used in nuclear weapons. The nucleus of some heavy elements like Uranium or Plutonium can split into two roughly equal sized nuclei with the release of energy. Such a process is known as nuclear fission. The fission reaction can occur spontaneously in the fissile material. The reaction is also self sustaining. Namely the fission of one nucleus induces the fission of nearby ones and so on, leading to what is called a chain reaction. If a sufficient amount of fissile material is concentrated in one place then the chain reaction proceeds very fast leading to an explosion. On the other hand certain very light elements like isotopes of hydrogen undergo nuclear fusion. In this process, two light nuclei can combine to form a single nucleus with the release of energy. This is the process by which energy is generated in the core of the sun and other stars. The fusion reaction requires very high temperatures and density before it can get initiated. All nuclear weapons use these two reactions in different ways. From the military usage point of view, they are classified as either tactical weapons or strategic weapons. Tactical weapons are low yield weapons that meant to be used in the battlefield against military formations. Strategic weapons are high yield weapons to be used against civilian populations in big cities.

 Thermonuclear Weapons, The Neutron Bomb, The Doomsday Bomb

Thermonuclear weapons, also called hydrogen bombs, get most of their yield from the fusion reaction. As in the case of boosted fission weapons, they require a fission explosion to trigger fusion, called the primary stage, to initiate the fusion reaction which is called the secondary stage. However unlike the boosted weapons, thermonuclear weapons contain a substantial amount of fusion fuel and most of their yield comes from fusion. Indeed these are the most powerful of nuclear weapons, often with yields of a few megatons. A third fission stage can also be added to produce very high yield weapons. The most powerful nuclear weapon to have been tested so far is the Tsar Bomba, a 50 megaton three stage weapon exploded by the USSR on 30th October 1961. Enhanced radiation weapons, also called neutron bombs are small tactical thermonuclear weapons which are designed to produce intense nuclear radiation. These weapons are designed to kill soldiers protected by armour (eg. inside tanks). The radiation produced by the neutron bombs can easily penetrate the armour of the tanks and kill the humans inside them. Salted Nuclear Weapons, or cobalt bombs, are thermonuclear weapons which are designed to produce a large amount of long lasting radioactive fallout. This would result in large scale radioactive contamination of the area they are dropped in. The difference between the fallout from the salted weapons and the unsalted one is that the former is much more in quantity and also has a much longer lifetime. The fallout remains radioactive for much longer. The long term effects of such weapons would therefore be much worse. These weapons are called Doomsday Devices since they could possibly kill everyone on earth.

The energy of a nuclear explosion is released in a number of different ways, all of which are lethal which is putting it mildly to say the least. The magnitude of the nuclear blast effect ( generally measured in pounds per square inch ) diminishes with distance from the center of the explosion. A burst on the surface produces the greatest over pressure at very close ranges (which is why surface bursts are used to attack very hard, very small targets such as missile silos), but less over pressure than an air burst at somewhat longer ranges.  Raising the height of the burst reduces the over pressure directly under the bomb, but widens the area at which a given smaller over pressure is produced. Thus, an attack on factories with a 1-Mt weapon might use an air burst at an altitude of 8,000 feet [2,400 m], which would maximize the area (about 28 mi2 [7,200 hectares]) that would receive 10 psi or more of over pressure. Nuclear weapons inflict ionizing radiation on people, animals, and plants in two different ways. Direct radiation occurs at the time of the explosion; it can be very intense, but its range is limited. Fallout radiation is received from particles that are made radioactive by the effects of the explosion, and subsequently distributed at varying distances from the site of the blast. Direct radiation did substantial damage to the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.in WWII when the first atom bombs were detonated. These two nuclear bombs were named Little Boy and Fat Man. The death toll of these explosions exceeded 150,000.

Approximately 35 percent of the energy from a nuclear explosion is an intense burst of thermal radiation heat. The effects are roughly analogous to the effect of a 2 second flash from an enormous sun lamp. Since the thermal radiation travels at the speed of light (actually a bit slower, since it is deflected by particles in the atmosphere), the flash of light and heat precedes the blast wave by several seconds, just as lightning is seen before the thunder is heard. Electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is an electro-magnetic wave similar to radio waves, which results from secondary reactions occurring when the nuclear gamma radiation is absorbed in the air or ground. It is similar to the electrical signal from lightning, but the rise in voltage is typically a hundred times faster. This means that most equipment designed to protect electrical facilities from lightning works too slowly to be effective against EMP. The strength of an EMP will destroy or damage the communications and electric power systems of the intended explosion area. For further reading on nuclear weapons click on the below Image
-----------------------------------------
----------------------------------http://www.jaysnet.com/666nuke.html

Network-Centric is Growing
     August 7, 2004

The era of Big Brother is in full boom and is a multi billion dollar industry. In America, simply go to any Wal-Mart. In a Wal-Mart parking lot you will notice the numerous cameras mounted on the building's roof and atop the light poles. Once inside Wal-Mart you notice the all seeing eye cams mounted in the ceiling's structure under a black dome which monitors the customers movements. The other monitoring devices are so concealed you would never know that your being watched. Then while your shopping you will notice numerous products a consumer may use to test their children ( or children testing their parents ) for drugs, alcohol, pregnancy and so forth. Wal-Mart and Deutsche Morgan Grenfell are two firms that have made the shift to network-centric operations.  Within the retailing sector, Wal-Mart consistently has outperformed its competitors. In 1996, it had earnings of $3 billion on sales of nearly $105 billion.  Wal-Mart has developed a significant competitive edge by reducing its cost of sales to two to three percentage points below the industry average. Wal-Mart was able to achieve this edge by making the shift to network-centric operations and translating information superiority into competitive advantage. Realizing that it had grown past the point where it could cost effectively synchronize supply and demand from the top down, the company over time set up a sophisticated operational architecture consisting of a sensory capability and a transaction grid to generate a higher level of awareness within its retail ecosystem. I myself was at a local post office and noticed a wall clock hanging on the wall. After closer inspection, while waiting in line, I noticed this wall clock was equipped with a small digital cam where the lobby could be easily monitored and recorded on tape.

The network-centric program being developed by the latest technology goes way beyond the current GPS monitoring system. Using a array of sensors, it is now feasible to use the current missile guided laser system which has been used in both Iraq wars, to guide missiles to designated targets, now will be used to guide bullets from a soldiers weapon. These network-centric bullets will have the capabilities to change course while in flight to hit their target. The US Coast Guard, along with the military contractors Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin, are implementing this technology on a new Coast Guard ship program known as the Offshore Patrol Cutter. In it's most basic form, the network-centric is a array cameras that monitors locations 24 hours a day. These cameras not only record what is happening, but will use software to analyze movements and then provide the most logical scenario to attack the problem. The era where cams and other visual surveillance tools have now out numbered the humans assigned to watch these surveillance monitors. This new software will take this task of viewing monitors out of the human element and into the computers software abilities. One example is analyzing certain bodily movements of a individual which the software deems suspicious. This will cause the computer's software program to track the individuals movements from camera to camera. Some current technologies such as face recognition software are still plagued by glitches and are not yet reliable enough for accurate analysis. Information technology is undergoing a fundamental shift from platform centric computing to network-centric computing. Platform centric computing emerged with the widespread proliferation of personal computers in business, the military, and in the home. We are now global computing environment.  Network-centric computing is governed by Metcalfe's Law, which asserts that the "power" of a network is proportional to the square of the number of nodes in the network. The U.S. economy has been on a steady growth path generally attributed to the emergence of larger global markets, the globalization of labor and capital, and the widespread application of information technology within business enterprises.

Network-centric operations deliver to the U.S. military the same powerful dynamics as they produced in American business. At the strategic level, the critical element for both is a detailed understanding of the appropriate competitive elements. Tactically, speed is critical. At the structural level, network-centric requires an operational architecture with three critical elements, which are sensor grids and transaction (or engagement) grids hosted by a high quality information computer grid. The structural or logical model for network-centric warfare has emerged. The entry fee is a high performance information grid that provides a backbone for computing and communications. The information grid enables the operational architectures of sensor grids and engagement grids. Sensor grids rapidly generate high levels of  awareness and synchronize awareness with military operations. Network-centric warfare allows our forces to develop a greater degree of speed and command decisions.
This is not theory, it is happening now.  The United States military may be special people in the armed forces, but we are not a special case. It would be false pride that would keep us from learning from others and change is inevitable. We can choose to lead it, or be victims of it.  The only thing harder than getting a new idea into the military mind is getting an old one out.

Network-Centric warfare derives its power from the strong networking of a well informed and geographically dispersed force.
Speed of Command is the process by which a superior information position is turned into a competitive advantage. It is characterized by the decisive altering of initial conditions, the development of high rates of change, and locking in success while locking out alternative enemy strategies. It recognizes all elements of the operating situation as parts of a complex adaptive ecosystem and achieves profound effect through the impact of closely coupled events. The information grid enables the operational architectures of sensor grids and engagement grids. Sensor grids rapidly generate high levels of battle space awareness and synchronize awareness with military operations.  The theory behind network-centric operations is that linking disparate portions of the battlefield will allow the U.S. armed services to deploy a more focused  and more lethal force by providing front-line war fighters with critical information, including a near real time view of the battlefield, to ensure knowledge superiority. Vice President Dick Cheney, spoke at an event sponsored by the Heritage Foundation. Cheney went through a laundry list of technological advantages that contributed to the Iraq military victory, though he never used the term network-centric. "Those advances in command and control allowed us to integrate joint operations much more effectively than ever before, thereby enabling commanders to make decisions more rapidly, to target strikes more precisely, to minimize human casualties, civilian casualties, and to accomplish the missions more successfully," Cheney said. All of the armed services have started incorporating network-centric principles into their operations.

The Department of Defense (  DOD ) has made significant progress in getting the right information to the right people in near real time. The goal is to develop high rates of change that an adversary cannot outpace, while sharply narrowing that adversary's strategic options. The DOD has demonstrated major gains in war fighting using wireless networking and other technologies. Major military failures frequently arise when leaders ignore fundamental changes in technology, doctrine or society.  There is an over reliance on technology as promulgated by network-centric warfare advocates, just as the United States overly relied on logistics and order of battle advantages in Vietnam. In Vietnam, the United States won every battle engagement, but in the end it did not matter, and terrorism presents a similar paradigm. An antagonist employing a mathematical, symmetrical battle match can still overwhelm superior technology.  The concept of network-centric warfare has additional shortcomings. It is still inherently vulnerable to the mathematical concept of warfare. Throw enough assets and chaos at the network, and it becomes vulnerable to enemy exploitation.

Information and networking alone are not substitutes for combat maneuver and the massing of armed forces. As in a chess game, situational awareness alone is not power and neither is pure knowledge by itself. Rather, knowing the move to make, or analysis, in relation to an anticipated enemy movement is key. Network-centric warfare is akin to a chess game where the movement of pieces is more important than the power and position of the pieces.  Network-centric warfare offers great opportunities, and its concept should not be ignored; however, there also are serious technological barriers that must be overcome, especially if there is a definitive fielding schedule to be achieved. Although scientific and engineering funding will probably assist in developing many of the required technologies, science and engineering technology frequently follow an independent development path, and more funding will not necessarily bring about a desired implemented system or entity. Science cannot be rushed. Western civilization relies on technology to make life easier, and this includes the military forces as well. Science and technology have made U.S. armed forces second to none in the world, yet it is not a total or singular answer to all threats and situations. Sometimes technology will fail, and sometimes it may even be irrelevant to an event or situation.

The term network-centric warfare broadly describes the combination of emerging tactics, techniques and procedures that a networked force can employ to create a decisive war fighting advantage.  In the industrial age, power was primarily derived from mass and the sources of power for moving mass. In the information age, power is increasingly derived from information sharing, information access and speed at which that information is obtained. Worldwide, militaries are crafting their individual responses to the challenges and opportunities of the information age. They are taking actions that demonstrate an increased understanding of the sources of information age war fighting advantage.  Besides network-centric warfare, currently used by the armed forces of the United States, Denmark, Norway and the Netherlands, other coined terms include Australia's network enabled warfare, the United Kingdom's network enabled capability, the Swedish armed forces' network based defense and the armed forces of the Republic of Singapore's knowledge based command and control. Each of these terms reflects its respective military's ongoing response to the information age. Clearly, militaries worldwide are continuing to take a close look at network-centric warfare and related concepts for information age warfare.

Perhaps the most fundamental flaw in network-centric warfare is that it is based on the premise that machine intelligence and analysis is superior and can be substituted for work now being performed by soldiers. However, no viable proof exists that software algorithms, information fusing or Boolean decision analysis will be any more successful than is the current soldier in the loop. It is important to remember that the history of commercial computer networks is replete with actual instances of massive communication, information, security and processing failures. It is one thing for a Web site or computer server to fail or be hacked; it is quite another for U.S. military forces to encounter the same degree of failure on the battle field.

OKLAHOMA OR NAZI~HOMA
---------------August 19, 2004

BELOW IS THE EDITORIAL OPINIONS OF JAYSNET

       A Brief Perspective Which Concerns Two Cases
The Case 1 story concerns a citizen outside the legal system whom has been falsely accused of numerous charges, and has more than enough evidence to prove individuals in The Oklahoma District Attorneys Office & The Oklahoma City Police Department guilty of obstruction of justice, racketeering, perjury, plus numerous other criminal activity. A complaint was filed with The FBI against Oklahoma City Judge Susan Caswell, Oklahoma City prosecutor Louis William Keel, and Oklahoma City Detective Robert Mathews. To view this case which concerns a innocent citizen against a corrupt legal system go to Jays Story Below:

This story concerns a individual inside the legal system and the innocent victims which were ruined. Joyce Gilchrist received her nickname "Black Magic" owing to her remarkable ability to see evidence other forensic chemists could not see, to draw conclusions that others would not approach, to turn speculation into fact and in doing so help the Oklahoma County District Attorney's office rack up win after win in district court. According to news reports, there are currently at least six federal, state and local agencies re-examining her work. Numerous falsely convicted individuals are being freed from Oklahoma's prisons in what is turning out to be one of the biggest scandals of all time in a state widely known for its scandals and corruption within the police and district attorneys office. A U.S. District Judge Ralph G. Thompson reviewed a Oklahoma death penalty case and concluded that Gilchrist in her testimony gave "untrue" and "misleading" testimony. Thompson noted that forensic chemist Joyce Gilchrist had clear knowledge of  DNA test results that would have pointed to the innocence of accused citizens. Thompson criticized not only Gilchrist's testimony and actions, but also noted that she has been repeatedly criticized by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals for such things as testifying "to a conclusion which was not scientifically supported" and submitting  reports that were "at best incomplete, and at worst inaccurate and misleading."

In a 21 year career, Oklahoma City police chemist Joyce Gilchrist was a prosecutor's dream: She delivered supportive lab analysis and convincing testimony that helped send hundreds to prison and at least 23 people to death row. So much of her work was questioned by appeals courts and forensics experts that she was suspended then fired from the Oklahoma City Police Department.. Investigators are digging through 1,197 of her cases to see whether anyone is behind bars
because of false or misleading testimony. In a the year 2001  Oklahoma lead the nation in carrying out the death penalty, and
with suspect convictions being reviewed even beyond the Gilchrist cases, some are pondering the unthinkable: Has Oklahoma executed the innocent? "I think there's a real concern that that has happened," said Jim Bednar, a former state and federal prosecutor and state judge. A FBI review of eight cases revealed significant flaws in her analysis. The state's Oklahoma crime lab completed an initial review of 817 files from Ms. Gilchrist's cases, turning up problems significant enough in at least 16 percent of them to warrant a more extensive review. Oklahoma's problems with pre-DNA forensic science have shadowed other cases as well, including some handled by the OSBI itself, known as the Oklahoma Bureau of Investigation. A judge in Wagoner County threw out the murder conviction of Albert Wesley Brown, who served 18 years of a life sentence. A former OSBI chemist testified that hairs found at the scene belonged to Mr. Brown, but recent DNA tests proved otherwise. In another case, the Oklahoma City Police Department asked the task force to review 10 cases handled by a second former police chemist, the late Janice Davis. In one such case, Ms. Davis used hair and fiber analysis to link Dewey George Moore to a 1984 murder. The task force ordered DNA tests to determine whether Mr. Moore has wrongly spent 16 years on death row. In yet another example of Gilchrist at her "worst" one need only look at the case of Curtis Edward McCarty, accused, tried and convicted of first degree murder. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in reversing McCarty's conviction ruled a new trial was required owing to numerous issues with Gilchrist's testimony. These issues included errors, failures and untrue testimony in the case. You can read the entire Appeals Court ruling at McCARTY v. STATE. The Oklahoma Court found that Ms. Gilchrist's delay and neglect in not completing her forensic examination and report was inexcusable. Another example of Joyce Gilchrist's criminal and unethical tactics may also be found in FOX v. STATE

In 1999, two men who had spent 12 years in prison, one on death row, were released after DNA tests cleared them in an Ada, Oklahoma rape-murder. The cases were luckily reviewed by a New York based Innocence Project and not by the Oklahoma City ( Nazi~homa )  Police or District Attorneys Office. "I'm very concerned that there may be anybody serving time or facing execution who may be actually innocent of the charges," said Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson, "And that's why I'm very interested in reviewing all of these cases."  Mr. Edmondson, opposes a blanket moratorium on executions, similar to one ordered by Illinois Gov. George Ryan after he learned that 13 death row inmates had been exonerated since 1987. The questions arising in Oklahoma are similar to concerns raised in other states in recent years. Also Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson's Office has failed to file one charge against Gilchrist, so I would question his sincerity and integrity on this matter.

Since the death penalty resumed in 1976, 98 death row inmates across the country including seven in Texas, have been cleared by new evidence, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. In 11 of those cases DNA testing played a role. In that time period, 736 people have been executed nationwide, in which many were innocent due to the corrupt individuals in the police and district attorneys office. "There's some opposition to our testing people already executed," said Mr. Bednar, the indigent defense system chief. "I think it would be a horrible mistake for us not to do that." noting the 11 Gilchrist cases in which inmates have already been executed will be not be considered. Many Oklahoma defense attorneys are convinced that such testing would prove that shoddy, possibly corrupt science was used to secure convictions. Complaints about Ms. Gilchrist's work arose while former Oklahoma County District Attorney Bob Macy was the chief prosecutor. Oklahoma County District Attorney Robert Macy, who often relied on testimony from Gilchrist, announced his resignation in June of  2001. Macy proudly claims to have tried at least 60 capital  cases and is known as America's Deadliest DA. The more appropriate term would be America's Most Crooked DA. Mr. Macy had defended Ms. Gilchrist, the main reason possibly stems from Bob Macy's endorsement of Susan Caswell for circuit judge, whom was another corrupt prosecutor for the city, and was elected as a judge stemming from such political propaganda flyers as the one below.

One Oklahoma judge, Judge Burkett, made a statement which summarizes the character of Susan Caswell, " I would have a serious problem believing anything Caswell said to me, and without absolute trust in both defense and prosecuting lawyers, a fair trial would be slim and I couldn't try a case which involved Susan Caswell."

Ms. Gilchrist joined the Oklahoma City Police Department in 1980 as a crime lab chemist, trained at the FBI academy in Quantico, Va. Two years later, she was the target of a complaint to the Southwestern Association of Forensic Scientists, filed by John T. Wilson, the chief forensic scientist in the Kansas City, Mo., regional crime laboratory. Mr. Wilson asserted that Ms. Gilchrist's testimony in four cases amounted to opinion that could not be supported by science. The group warned her to avoid mixing "personal opinions" and "opinions based upon facts derived from scientific evidence." According to a Police Department memo in, she continued to have problems with professional organizations. She was expelled from the Association of Crime Scene Reconstruction for "ethical violations." The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in 1988 overturned the murder conviction of Curtis Edward McCarty, ruling in part that Ms. Gilchrist testified beyond her expertise. In another case, a federal judge in 1999 in Oklahoma City overturned the rape conviction of Alfred Brian Mitchell, ruling that Ms. Gilchrist's testimony was "terribly misleading, if not false." In another case, a state judge ordered Jeffrey Todd Pierce released after he had served nearly 15 years on a rape conviction. They [police and prosecutors] basically had an advocate and not a scientist in Joyce Gilchrist and that's tragic. Ms. Gilchrist was transferred to the police equine lab in March 2000. She was then placed on paid administrative. Former Police Chief M.T. Berry, who requested the FBI review of  her work, said the decision to terminate Ms. Gilchrist came after a police review board hearing.

"My heart goes out to all the other people I know that are in here who are innocent because of the Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office and the Oklahoma City Police Department," said Jeffrey Todd Pierce after he was freed from a Oklahoma prison. Mr. Pierce sat behind bars for 15 long years before DNA tests proved his innocence. Mr. Pierce was another victim of
Joyce Gilchrist. Along with Gilchrist's misrepresentation of hair and fiber analysis in court to get convictions for the district attorney's office,  the Oklahoma City Police Department can't even keep its records straight. Some investigations won't be able to review certain cases for three years that include 1980, 1981, and 1990 because they can't be found. In yet another case, DNA evidence showed that a man named Ronnie Lott was a perpetrator of a crime in a second trial in which Gilchrist had discounted Lott as a suspect based on her analysis in the first trial! One Alfred Brian Mitchell was convicted for a 1991 murder as well as rape and sodomy of Elaine Scott.  In 1999 a Federal Court in Oklahoma overturned the rape and sodomy convictions as the jury in the original trial had not been informed a FBI agent refuted Joyce Gilchrist's test results and testimony. Gilchrist also testified about hair evidence in the trial of Goldie Fowler's grandson, Mark.  Three months prior to her death, Mark was convicted and sentenced to death for the murders of three grocery store employees.  Mark always maintained he was the lookout man when the murders occurred and that he never killed anyone.  Gilchrist's testimony about hair evidence implicated him as a killer.  He was executed January 23,  2001. Goldie's son, Jim Fowler, and his wife Ann , now have too many unanswered questions about Gilchrist's  forensic examination and testimony and why their son is dead and why they were led to believe for a total of 10 years that an innocent man raped and murdered their loved one.

Seldom in our modern system of criminal justice do we see such abuse and criminal activity as in Oklahoma City. We see innocent persons convicted largely on the basis of false, misleading and unfounded testimony by witnesses and those within the legal system who are willing to say or do anything to please the district attorney's office. A justice system so flawed and untrustworthy that it should be replaced from bottom to top. Until that time it is certain there will be more cases such as that of Jeffrey Todd Pierce, an innocent man convicted for a terrible crime, and who as a result of a corrupt justice system, lost his family, fifteen years of his life and his future and all this without compensation from a state willing only to say "We're Sorry" and do nothing to compensate the man for his losses. Until such time as districts attorney, police officers and crime lab personnel are held criminally liable for their lies, deceptions and false testimony we are certain to have a criminal justice bordering on the criminal itself. It's time we started enforcing the law on those sworn to uphold it. A very good place to start would be with Joyce Gilchrist, Susan Caswell, Lou Keel, Detective Robert Mathews, and Bob Macy. I wish I could print a happy ending concerning Joyce Gilchrist, but I can't.  The below civil case was dismissed and Ms. Gilchrist, as well as Bob Macy, are proven immune from prosecution. I might add that the Oklahoma Attorney General's Office and the Oklahoma City District Attorneys Office failed to file or charge any crime against Ms. Gilchrist, not one!

IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
Jeffrey Todd Pierce,
          Plaintiff,
v.
JOYCE GILCHRIST,
D. A. Robert H. Macy,
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY,
OKLAHOMA; AND THE
STATE OF OKLAHOMA

DefendantS.  No. CJ-2003-374
(Civil relief more than $10,000)
Filed: 01/14/2003
Closed: 08/14/2003

Judge: Harbour, David M.

This abusive conduct will never end. One story involves the wife of Wes Lane, who replaced Bob Macy as the current Oklahoma City District Attorney. Wes Lane's wife, Lori Hansen, pleaded guilty to a drug felony ( No. CF-2001-6065 )
in 2001. The result's were a little more than a slap on the wrist and the judge was no other than Susan Caswell. This case was expunged and can no longer be found on the OSCN network. To view the current information simply click on case No. CF-2001-6065 Oklahoma City Police Sex Crimes Division Lt. Robert Matthews, has also had complaints filed against him and reported to the FBI concerning numerous criminal acts. It was just recently, in December of  2003, Gerald ``Butch'' McKenna, a detective in the same department as Lt. Matthews, committed suicide in his own office at The Oklahoma City Police Department. The suicide may have been related to officer McKenna possibly informing on Matthews and other officers guilty of criminal activity. When a police officer commits suicide in his own office at The Oklahoma Police Station, this should indicate something is terribly wrong. Another individual whom has had criminal complaints filed against him is Oklahoma City DA prosecutor William Lou Keel. One example of Mr. Keel's work concerned a child sexual abuse case. Mr. Keel admitted that their state expert witness, a Alfred Lera, who had testified for the State in over two dozen child abuse cases was himself found guilty of the sexual molestation of at least one 12 year old boy and taking nude photos of  two other young boys under the age of 17.  Lou Keel also has had complaints filed against him made to the FBI and The Department of Justice concerning criminal activity. In closing, a police officer Oklahoma City Police Captain Tom Jester told me, " THE OKLAHOMA CITY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE DOES NOT PROSECUTE POLICE OFFICERS OR THEIR OWN." It seems he was correct.
--------IN MEMORY OF THE 911 VICTIMS
----------WE WILL NEVER FORGET YOU
                           -------           September 11, 2001

SEPTEMBER 2004; Following the introduction of the first Congressional legislation building upon the findings of the 9/11 commission report, numerous american civilians and organizations have called for a calm and deliberative process before lawmakers enact further legislative changes that would have a far reaching impact on the freedoms and liberties of all Americans. The Patriot Act has taught us that legislation passed in haste can lead to an unnecessary loss of privacy and freedom. As Congress considers ways to make the country safer, we must also strive to protect the Constitution rather than undermine it. The 9/11 commissions recommendations warrant careful deliberation and Congress must not simply rubber-stamp its findings to appease their future political future. In short, no more telling people what they want to hear to achieve future votes and falsely portray themselves as the guardians of good, when they are more like the fodder of  fools. Any restructuring of our national intelligence operations must be done with civil liberties in minds and Congress must not blindly implement the 911 commissions findings without considering the long term ramifications that it will have on our basic freedoms and liberties. We must not permit a ‘trust us we're the government’ attitude to guide significant changes that will affect all Americans. At the conclusion of the 911 report, the clear signs of miscommunication, incompetent intelligence, failure to follow up on crucial intelligence, was a loud and clear sign of human error. Any organization may have the most advanced technology and monitoring analysis system, but if the human element fails to follow up on these information gathering technologies, they are useless and no future laws such as The Patriot Act Law, The RICO Law, or these Home Land Security type institutions are worthless.

If we've learned anything from the Patriot Act, its that reform needs to follow the Constitution to keep America strong and
we need to make sure that happens with the 9/11 report, which should be commended for its attention to personal freedoms but should not be adopted blindly. The ideal of  the 911  reports vision for intelligence reform,  includes a White House "czar"
who would be a United States individual whom has complete managerial control over the intelligence community. This is Big Brother in a nutshell and the thought of such a individual with this power is a horrifying aspect of where we are heading. Even the ACLU  expressed concern that having one person in charge of both domestic and foreign intelligence gathering could result in the greater use of espionage trade craft against American citizens on American soil, which is inherently antithetical to the Constitution.  The ACLU seems to forget that morality and values have nothing to do with politics or our government. A proposed national intelligence director position brings back memories of the Pharaohs of  Egypt, the Russian Czars, Napoleon, Adolph Hitler, and numerous others who were trusted with to much power.

Throughout this country's history, the phrase "national security" has often been used as a pretext for massive violations of individual rights. In the name of national security, President Wilson authorized the round-up and deportation of thousands of foreign born suspected "radicals" during the Palmer Raids; and President Franklin Roosevelt interned 120,000 Japanese Americans. The Cold War era brought loyalty oaths, blacklisting and travel restrictions, and the 1950s McCarthy Red Scare where paranoia had a communist to be hiding under everyone's bed or in their closet. None of these measures were actually necessary to preserve national security; but they were used and all of them violated civil liberties in the name of national security.

The September 11, 2001 attack mobilized much of our country in the fight against terrorism. However, this wave of "anti-terrorist" activity, all in the name of national security, launched one of the most serious civil liberties crises our nation has ever seen. An immutable characteristic of our nation is freedom. If we allow the interests of "national security" to take away our freedoms, we surrender what it is to be an American. The First Amendment exists precisely to protect the most offensive and controversial speech from government suppression.

Historically, at times of national stress, real or imagined. First Amendment rights come under enormous pressure. During the Red Scare of the early 1920s, thousands were deported for their political views. During the McCarthy period, the infamous blacklist ruined lives and careers. Today, the creators, producers and distributors of popular culture are often blamed for the nations deep social problems. Calls for censorship threaten to erode free speech. America, according to the government, was shocked during the Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake Super Bowl incident, then months later, vice president Dick Cheney
verbally tells a US Senator to " Fuck Off " on the Senate Floor. This is the hypocrisy that americans are subjected to on a daily basis. Let us not forget the past or we are doomed to repeat it in the future.

Would You Like a Order of  Surveillance With Your Pizza?

Attorney General John Ashcroft says NO to privacy

Text accompanying the video urges the viewer to help prevent a "Total Surveillance Society" and notes that "the Bush Administration's policies, coupled with invasive new technologies, could eliminate your right to privacy completely."
The Patriot Act gives the government broad surveillance powers that can be used to intrude on the private lives of innocent citizens. Astonishingly, if he deemed it necessary, top Nazi-Goon Attorney General Ashcroft could get authorization from a secret court to place wiretaps on your phones without probable cause. He can demand records of your reading habits from bookstores and libraries. He can even make and keep a copy of the key to your house. The Bush Administration’s approach to preventing terrorism has been based on a Orwellian approach that turns every American into a suspect

THE ORBITING GLOBAL SURVEILLANCE SOCIETY
-------------------------------September 21,2004